Oregon Ducks Football Up-Tempo Style Flawed In The Two Minute Drill Vs. USC
The Oregon Ducks could be in the BCS driver's seat if they could close their game with the USC Trojans the way they generally process their offense--an effective, quick one to two minute drill that puts the defense on its heels and picks up points that eventually puts pressure on the offense to catch up. It's a strategy that's generally worked for Chip Kelly en route to a 24-1 conference record prior to this weekend.
But something strange happened this week against USC.
Down three with a chance to tie things up and all three timeouts, Oregon went up-tempo to get into field goal range. And for most of the drive, things went according to plan, as Oregon needed only a minute to cross midfield, and a few more seconds after that to get into field goal range. It looked as if the Ducks would have a chance to either take the lead or get close enough to give the inconsistent Alejandro Maldonado a kick he could hit.
It didn't work out that cleanly though.
With 1:13 left, Darron Thomas found Rahsaan Vaughn on a wide receiver screen, but was stopped short of the first down marker. Kelly didn't call any of his timeouts, and the clock kept on ticking down from 1:06 to 0:51. Oregon picked up a first down on the next play to stop the clock at 0:45.
With 0:38 left, Barner rushed up the middle to try and pick up another first down, but was stopped short of the first down marker. Oregon would not get their next snap off until 0:23 remained. Instead of a spike or a timeout, Oregon decided to roll out and throw the football away (it might have been an overthrow by Darron Thomas or an option to throw away if the coverage was good, but it still wasted time). Kelly would not use his timeouts and it cost Oregon the opportunity to have extra plays if they did pick up first downs. Thomas would then make the critically poor checkdown to Lavasier Tuinei on the quick throw for the two yard loss, when Oregon really did have to use their timeouts.
With three timeouts in his pocket, Kelly would use only timeouts with under 0:07 remaining to get the field goal try and miss. It didn't work out, and Oregon's title hopes were done in.
Kelly does not like the defense to have any time to recover when his offense is rolling, especially when he's trying to come from behind and win a football game. So he's opposed to using those timeouts because it would allow the Trojans to sub in and out and stall Oregon momentum. Makes sense strategically, but in a two minute drill it seems like it became a weakness for the Ducks. Too much time trickled off the clock if they don't pick up the first downs, and it kept Oregon from getting the yards they needed to win.
While I doubt it's something that you can really plan for, it might give opposing Pac-12 defenses another potential way to combat Oregon's offense with minimal time on the clock. Because time catches up to anyone, even the Oregon offense.
3 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I know you watch Oregon football...
…and it’s clear that you understand why he’s not calling the timeouts. That’s why this is so frustrating. Because the outcome was undesirable, you assume that the wrong strategy was employed. That’s so stupid. If one of those plays had broken for a TD, or if Maldonado had just hit that FG and Oregon had won in overtime, you’d be praising Kelly for an innovative and gutsy strategy. But because a kicker missed a FG, you write this inane piece. USC called a TO to stop the clock as Oregon was driving. The clock was running, and USC stopped it because to them, getting subs in outweighed the cost of allowing Oregon an extra play or two. That should tell you something about the effectiveness of Kelly’s strategy.
As an Oregon fan, what doesn’t make sense to me is why Kelly, knowing that he doesn’t want to use TOs in a two minute drill, didn’t use at least 2 of his TOs on the previous USC drive. He could have saved the time without slowing down the momentum of his offense.
“Instead of a spike or a timeout, Oregon decided to roll out and throw the football away (it might have been an overthrow by Darron Thomas or an option to throw away if the coverage was good, but it still wasted time).” Really? It MIGHT have been an overthrow or a decision to throw it away? No no, you’re right. I bet they called a rollout throw away in the huddle because they wanted to take exactly six seconds off and stop the clock. Do you consider every incompletion in the two minute drill to be an egregious waste of time?
Cliff Harris on deciding to be a Duck: "Not too far, but not too close. Just everything about Oregon - I love the green."
by AutzenGetsBlounted on Nov 23, 2011 8:50 AM PST reply actions
I don't have a lot of problem going up-tempo, especially with over a minute left
But Chip Kelly should have called a time out after Barner’s run with just under 40 seconds left. There are many defenders of Kelly saying that Oregon was moving the ball when they went up-tempo, but USC had JUST called a time out, and Oregon still gained 9 yards. IMO, losing that 10+ seconds was a huge mistake, which led to a 40 yard field goal attempt instead of a possible 30 yarder.
--AddictedToQuack, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog
Yeah, it was a really curious situation. I can understand why Kelly wanted to try and keep the defense on their heels, but it’s not like you’re gaining too pronounced an advantage, and it’s cancelled out by the time you lose when you really need to use every second you have.
I’ll be interested to see how he adapts to future situations.
by Avinash Kunnath on Nov 23, 2011 12:04 PM PST up reply actions

by 






















