Jeremy Lin And How Stanford, UCLA, Cal, And The Pac-12 Missed Him
Pac-12 basketball has been in a bad place for awhile. Now everyone's probably wondering why they didn't get Jeremy Lin while he was in their backyard.
As has probably been recognized all week long, Lin was a Bay Area kid, a Palo Alto High sensation. Lin's senior season was a campaign for the ages, as he led his team to an incredible two year run which ended with a 64-3 overall record, culminating in an upset over powerhouse Mater Dei in the CIF Division II State title, capturing state player of the year honors.
So how didn't he end up in the Pac-12? The interest wasn't there early on enough, as this Sports Illustrated feature points out.
He sent his CV (4.2 GPA, perfect score on his SAT II Math 2C in the ninth grade) and a DVD of highlights—edited by a friend of a friend from church—to all eight Ivies, Stanford, Cal and his dream school, UCLA. Only four schools responded. Out of the Pac-10, Lin recalls, UCLA "wasn't interested," Stanford was "fake interested," and during a visit to Cal a staffer "called me 'Ron.'"
Two crucial things occurred that probably set back his recruitment.
One, Lin got injured his junior season before a CIF championship game, and it was apparently serious enough that it kept most Pac-12 schools from sending out an offer. It's not like schools didn't know what he did with Palo Alto, but generally you give out offers out by the end of the junior season after you're sure the guy you're giving an offer to will pan out at the next level.
The injury caused a lot of hesitation by Pac-12 schools to wait and see what Lin would do his senior season sent him on the road to Harvard, who offered him early and got his acceptance before other Pac-12 schools could send out offers.
So keep in mind that Lin didn't get an offer from Pac-12 schools because Lin had already made his verbal to Harvard and made it clear he was sticking to it. Of course, it's no guarantee any of these Pac-12 schools tried a full-court press later on when they saw what Lin did his senior year, so it probably breaks both ways. But the Pac-12 schools took their precautions with Lin and probably ended up going with surer things.
Two of the Pac-12 schools didn't really end up regretting their decisions. Cal landed Jerome Randle, who ended up becoming the Pac-10 Player of the Year by his senior season and led the Golden Bears to their first conference title in ages. UCLA found an under-the-radar gem in Russell Westbrook, who ended up being a critical cog of a Final Four squad. Of course, Lin might have been able to become the primary point the next couple of years, and you have to wonder how three/four years of Lin compared to two years of Westbrook might've turned out for the Sons of Westwood, but it's hard to see many Bruins fans turning down their Final Four appearance.
Stanford though? They whiffed. Adam Zagoria has more about the Stanford recruitment situation, where Lin was being coveted by the Cardinal but claimed they only had space for one more guy. Except...
By early February 2006, Stanford accepted commitments from two additional players, giving them a five-man recruiting class.
Their names?
One was Landry Fields, a wing who chose Stanford over Arizona. He, of course, is now the current starting shooting guard on the Knicks.
The other was Da’Veed Dildy, a 6-5 point guard out of Chicago whom Johnson had courted heavily.
"They both commit and they both get scholarships," Diepenbrock said.
"Oh, boy did that not go over."
Diepenbrock said Lin and his mother were so turned off by what happened, that when a Stanford assistant tried calling Lin later on to get him to walk-on, he never returned the calls.
"Come on, coach, I can’t play for somebody I can’t trust," Diepenbrock recalled Lin saying.
Fields turned out alright, but Dildy averaged a grand 1.3 points per game in his four seasons on the Farm.
So Stanford, if you're mad you didn't get the hometown product, Trent Johnson is where to direct your ire. It's hard to complain about a class that included the Lopez twins and Landry Fields, but the thought that the Cardinal could have had a man in their backyard who would've loved to gone there has to sting a little.
Larry Scott will be marketing Asia these next few years, and he should have plenty of strong negotiating to do in his favor for the conference. But I'd bet he'd have loved to have been able to market Lin as a Pac-12 alumnus to make the sell easier for college basketball. Point one, Ivy League.
(Then again, with Tom Hansen emceeing during these years, there's a good chance we'd have still missed out on West Coast Lin-sanity regardless.)
9 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Stanford
I’m surprised Stanford didn’t get Melanie Wade for their volleyball program. She is an amazing athlete and she too, was right aspcross the street.
Or maybe...
He just wasn’t that good in high school?
Everyone is focusing on his play now and acting like it should have been clear to anyone watching that he was going to be a phenom. He averaged 5 pts a game as a freshman in the Ivy League. His senior year he averaged 16 pt/game. Should every Ivy Leaguer who scores that much per game get an NBA contract? Or serious D-1 consideration? Players develop. Look at a guy like David Robinson or Dennis Rodman. They were marginal prospects, at best, in high school and become all-world over time. He averaged 18 pts/game in the NBA D-league. Good, but not amazing, numbers.
And if performance today is what matters, then Cal missed out just as badly in not signing him. Jerome Randle’s Player of the Year award in probably the worst year in Pac12 history (save the current) is pretty meaningless. He’s not an NBA level player. Lin is. Maybe the Bears could have gone further in the tourney with him. It was a miss.
Do I wish we’d had a Jeremy Lin in Cardinal red? If he played like he is now, yes. All I know is his one game against Stanford he scored 0 points. But I’m sure he would have been better than Dildy.
Lin was pretty good in high school. You don’t lead your team to state championships if there’s nothing there.
Randle has been competing in and out on the NBDL level, so it’s safe to say that he’s pretty close to the fringe, if not quite there.
by Avinash Kunnath on Feb 13, 2012 5:57 PM PST up reply actions
So you’re contending that the Bears couldn’t have benefited from Lin being on the team because their point guard from the same class is playing in the minor leagues?
I knew a guy at Stanford who was all-state in Nevada. He took his high school team to the state championship game (though they lost). He was the star of that team. But he tried to walk on and just couldn’t cut it. And this was before Montgomery turned the team into regular NCAA competitors. Being a high school star doesn’t always translate.
Sports is a meritocracy. If Lin were a better prospect in high school, he would have gotten offers. Unless he clearly communicated he wanted Stanford, UCLA, Cal or nobody, which I’ve not heard.
by farmerboy99 on Feb 13, 2012 11:51 PM PST up reply actions
Disagree
Sports is a meritocracy. If Lin were a better prospect in high school, he would have gotten offers.
Evaluation of talent in sports is very subjective. This is why you see many 5 star rated football players and first round draft picks not reach their potential in college and in the NFL. 40 yard times, verticals, bench repetitions and distance jumping across ping tables are objective measures, which too often are the sole basis for rating players.
As for Lin based on your logic, he would have never even gotten a shot in the NBA because if he was good enough he wouldn’t be the 4th best point guard on the team. He was buried so far down the depth chart, that the only reason he is playing is because of injury flukes and a desperate coach who probably thought ‘what the heck I have got nothing to lose, let’s put him in’.
by Utah-UCLA alum on Feb 14, 2012 8:25 AM PST up reply actions
Is talent evaluation perfect? No. But, 5-star recruits have a much greater chance of making it to the NFL than do 2-star and 3-star. There are a lot of 2- and 3-star players in the NFL, but that’s because there are hundreds of players rated at that level compared to the dozens of 4- and 5-star players.
Lin’s performance now is not evidence that he was misevaluated. He may have been, but all the facts I see (the lack of interest from any D-1 program, the mediocre performance in the Ivy League as a freshman, etc.) lead me to believe he was a player who developed and is tenacious.
For a much better (and more balanced) article on this topic, check out Rick Reilly’s take here: http://espn.go.com/espn/story/_/id/7574087/overlooking-jeremy-lin
Let's be honest
One of the biggest reasons he wasn’t given much a look by these schools is because he is Asian-American.
Did he play AAU ball
I don’t follow basketball recruiting much, but I always thought coaches don’t survey the high school circuit for talent, rather they evaluate the AAU teams. Did Lin play AAU, and if he didn’t, could the fact he didn’t play against the top flight talent the nation has to offer in the various AAU tournaments hurt his recruitment?
I'm fairly certain he did play AAU as a teenager
Most Asian-Americans have tended to play in their own leagues. Lin definitely went outside those circles to compete with the best.
by Avinash Kunnath on Feb 13, 2012 5:55 PM PST up reply actions

by 






















